Mitchner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mitchner v. State

627 So. 2d 133, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12109, 1993 WL 502193

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1993·No. No. 92-2659·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand with directions that the sentencing order be modified to provide for eighteen (18) months probation as stated at the sentencing hearing, instead of the three-year term stated in the sentencing order. We also direct that the provisions for court costs, investigation costs and the public defender’s fee be deleted from the sentencing order without prejudice to the state to seek assessment of those fees upon proper notice and hearing.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand with directions that the sentencing order be modified to provide for eighteen (18) months probation as stated at the sentencing hearing, instead of the three-year term stated in the sentencing order. We also direct that the provisions for court costs, investigation costs and the public defender’s fee be deleted from the sentencing order without prejudice to the state to seek assessment of those fees upon proper notice and hearing.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Mitchner v. State, 627 So. 2d 133, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12109, 1993 WL 502193 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

627 So. 2d 133 (Mitchner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.