Mitchem v. State
211 S.W.3d 670, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 109, 2007 WL 146468
Opinion
Order
Marcus E. Mitchem appeals the motion court’s denial of his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Mitchem claims that motion court erred because there was no factual basis established for his plea of guilty.
Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchem v. State, 211 S.W.3d 670, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 109, 2007 WL 146468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
211 S.W.3d 670 (Mitchem v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
COLLEGE OF OZARKS v. Wilson
211 S.W.3d 670 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)