Mitchem v. James

197 S.E. 127, 213 N.C. 673, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 179
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 25, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee, Curiam.

We agree witb tbe trial court that if plaintiff’s own

expert witness cannot say she was improperly treated and has no opinion as to whether the broken bones were properly set, the evidence is not such as to require its submission to the jury. The case is not unlike Ferguson v. Glenn, 201 N. C., 128, 159 S. E., 5.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchem v. James, 197 S.E. 127, 213 N.C. 673, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 179 (N.C. 1938).

197 S.E. 127 (Mitchem v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gray v. . Weinstein
42 S.E.2d 616 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
Buckner Ex Rel. Buckner v. Wheeldon
33 S.E.2d 480 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Covington v. James
214 N.C. 71 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)