Mitchell's lessee v. De Roche
1 Yeates 12
Opinion
This is a very clear case. Without payment of the full consideration money the defendant is not entitled to the premises on any principle of law or equity. Such is the evident intention of the contract. Tet the defendant tender his money and he can then recover back the land.
Judgment pro quer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell's lessee v. De Roche, 1 Yeates 12 (Pa. 1791).
1 Yeates 12 (Mitchell's lessee v. De Roche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willis v. Wozencraft
22 Cal. 607 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Seitzinger v. Ridgway
9 Watts 496 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1840)