Mitchell's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Mitchell's Appeal

38 A. 1103, 182 Pa. 537, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 839

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 11, 1897

DocketAppeal, No. 572

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A. 1103 (Mitchell's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell's Appeal, 38 A. 1103, 182 Pa. 537, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 839 (Pa. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chiee Justice Sterrett,

This case was argued with the appeal in Samuel Mitchell’s Estate, No. 505, of January term, 1896, in which an opinion has just been filed affirming the decree of the orphans’ court. The questions considered and decided in that case virtually dispose of the questions presented by the record in this case, and require that the decree of the court below be affirmed. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error- that requires discussion. For reasons which sufficiently appear in the record of this case, and in the opinion above referred to, the learned judge was clearly right in dismissing appellant’s exception to the auditor’s report, etc., and in discharging rule to show cause.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Chiee Justice Sterrett,

This case was argued with the appeal in Samuel Mitchell’s Estate, No. 505, of January term, 1896, in which an opinion has just been filed affirming the decree of the orphans’ court. The questions considered and decided in that case virtually dispose of the questions presented by the record in this case, and require that the decree of the court below be affirmed. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error- that requires discussion. For reasons which sufficiently appear in the record of this case, and in the opinion above referred to, the learned judge was clearly right in dismissing appellant’s exception to the auditor’s report, etc., and in discharging rule to show cause.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A. 1103, 182 Pa. 537, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchells-appeal-pa-1897.