Mitchelle Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.

447 F. App'x 772
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 15, 2011
Docket10-71803
StatusUnpublished

This text of 447 F. App'x 772 (Mitchelle Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchelle Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr., 447 F. App'x 772 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Mitchelle S. Ramos, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Padilla-Romero v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1011, 1012 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in concluding that Ramos’ conviction for unlawful driving and taking of a vehicle under California Vehicle Code § 10851(a) is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1011(a)(43)(G) that renders him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). Ramos’ contention that section 10851(a) is overbroad because it encompasses joyriding is unpersuasive. See Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 940, 947 (9th Cir.2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PADILLA-ROMERO v. Holder
611 F.3d 1011 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Arteaga v. Mukasey
511 F.3d 940 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 F. App'x 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchelle-ramos-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.