Mitchell Will
This text of 215 A.2d 676 (Mitchell Will) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In this will contest proponents proved the will and its execution, by the necessary subscribing witnesses thereby shifting the burden to the contestants. The hearing judge found that taking as true all of contestants’ testimony as' to decedent’s mental and physical condition, the contestants’ case was still insufficient to show undue influence exerted upon the decedent by any person. :or . persons in confidential relationship. These findings of the hearing judge were affirmed by the court en banc and we see no reason why they should be disturbed.
Decree affirmed. Each party to bear own cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.2d 676, 420 Pa. 218, 1966 Pa. LEXIS 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-will-pa-1966.