Home/Supreme Court/Mitchell v. Zweibon

Mitchell v. Zweibon

453 U.S. 912, 101 S. Ct. 3147
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 29, 1981
DocketNo. 79-881; No. 79-882; No. 79-883
StatusPublished
Cited by114 cases

This text of 453 U.S. 912 (Mitchell v. Zweibon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. Zweibon, 453 U.S. 912, 101 S. Ct. 3147 (1981).

Opinion

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: Nos. 79-881 and 79-883, 196 U. S. App. D. C. 265, 606 F. 2d 1172; No. 79-882, 196 U. S. App. D. C. 276, 606 F. 2d 1183.

Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Republic of Colombia v. DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA INC.
619 F. Supp. 2d 7 (E.D. New York, 2007)
Bansal v. Russ
513 F. Supp. 2d 264 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.
103 F. Supp. 2d 223 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Blatter
175 F.3d 378 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
Tisdale v. A.G. Edwards & Sons
938 F. Supp. 232 (S.D. New York, 1996)
In Re NASDAQ Market Makers Antitrust Litigation
938 F. Supp. 232 (S.D. New York, 1996)
In Re State Police Litigation
888 F. Supp. 1235 (D. Connecticut, 1995)
Acierno v. Cloutier
40 F.3d 597 (Third Circuit, 1994)
Robert F. Davis v. James Grusemeyer, Raymond Gurak, Donald Yingling, David v. Brody, and Charles E. Waldron
996 F.2d 617 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
972 F.2d 53 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Kulwicki, III v. Dawson
969 F.2d 1454 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Hartford Associates v. United States
792 F. Supp. 358 (D. New Jersey, 1992)
No. 90-6051
948 F.2d 1402 (Third Circuit, 1991)
Imogene Williams v. United States Elevator Corporation and Elcon Enterprises, Inc.
920 F.2d 1019 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)
G-69 v. Degnan
745 F. Supp. 254 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
Cooney v. Park County
792 P.2d 1287 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1990)
Rose v. Bartle
871 F.2d 331 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Rose, Joseph, in No. 88-1634 v. Bartle, Paul, Asher, Robert, Smyth, Joseph A. Jr., Goodman, Bert, Vance, Oscar, Montgomery County, and Republican Party of Montgomery County. (d.c.civ. No. 86-6255). Reed, Trudy W., in No. 88-1646 v. Bartle, Paul B., Banning, Rita C., Demaioribus, James R., Collectively as the Salary Board of Montgomery County, Bartle, Paul, Individually, Asher, Robert, Smyth, Joseph A., Jr., Goodman, Bert, Vance, Oscar, Montgomery County, Republican Party of Montgomery County, Commissioners of the County of Montgomery (d.c.civ. No. 87-6405). Hill, Frederick B. v. Bartle, Paul, Asher, Robert, Smyth, Joseph A., Jr., Goodman, Bert, Vance, Oscar, Montgomery County, and Republican Party of Montgomery County (d.c. Civil 86-6963). Hill, Frederick B. v. Bartle, Paul, Asher, Robert, Smyth, Joseph A., Jr., Goodman, Bert, and Republican Party of Montgomery County, Montgomery County (d.c. Civil 87-3927). Appeal of Frederick Hill, Kolimaga, Walter, in No. 88-1653 v. Bartle, Paul, Asher, Robert, Montgomery County, and Republican Party of Montgomery County (d.c. Civil No. 87-0804)
871 F.2d 331 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Richard Marx, Individually and Kristina Marx, a Minor v. Glenn H. Gumbinner, Bruce H. Colton and Pamela J. Roebuck
855 F.2d 783 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Williams v. Hepting
844 F.2d 138 (Third Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 U.S. 912, 101 S. Ct. 3147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-zweibon-scotus-1981.