Mitchell v. Wilson

137 S.E. 402, 36 Ga. App. 610, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 184
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 16, 1927
Docket17839
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 402 (Mitchell v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. Wilson, 137 S.E. 402, 36 Ga. App. 610, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 184 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The only contention of the plaintiff in error is that the evidence adduced before a jury in a justice’s court does [611]*611not authorize the verdict returned. The testimony is in sharp conflict, and a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in error would have been fully authorized. However, the testimony of the plaintiff in the justice’s court, if believed by the jury,' as it must have been, supports the verdict returned, and that verdict having been approved by the .superior court on certiorari, it can not be set aside here. Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 402, 36 Ga. App. 610, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-wilson-gactapp-1927.