Mitchell v. Wilson
This text of 137 S.E. 402 (Mitchell v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only contention of the plaintiff in error is that the evidence adduced before a jury in a justice’s court does [611]*611not authorize the verdict returned. The testimony is in sharp conflict, and a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in error would have been fully authorized. However, the testimony of the plaintiff in the justice’s court, if believed by the jury,' as it must have been, supports the verdict returned, and that verdict having been approved by the .superior court on certiorari, it can not be set aside here. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 S.E. 402, 36 Ga. App. 610, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-wilson-gactapp-1927.