Mitchell v. Wilson
3 D.C. 92
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 F. Cas. 524 →
Opinion
But the CouRT (Thruston, J., absent,) refused to reinstate the cause. ■
But the Court refused; being of opinion that when the action of replevin was discontinued, the goods were no longer in the custody of the law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Wilson, 3 D.C. 92 (circtddc 1827).
3 D.C. 92 (Mitchell v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.