Mitchell v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Mitchell v. Wheeler

635 P.2d 680, 54 Or. App. 675, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3819

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 9, 1981

DocketNo. L80-1452, CA A20222

StatusPublished

This text of 635 P.2d 680 (Mitchell v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Wheeler, 635 P.2d 680, 54 Or. App. 675, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3819 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s denial of an item in his cost bill.¹ On oral argument, counsel for defendant conceded that the item was a proper one.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded with instructions to allow plaintiff the additional amount of $92.40, as prayed for in his cost bill, for the cost of taking the deposition of Dr. Ochs. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s denial of an item in his cost bill.¹ On oral argument, counsel for defendant conceded that the item was a proper one.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded with instructions to allow plaintiff the additional amount of $92.40, as prayed for in his cost bill, for the cost of taking the deposition of Dr. Ochs. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

635 P.2d 680, 54 Or. App. 675, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-wheeler-orctapp-1981.