Mitchell v. Value Rent-A-Car, Inc.
573 So. 2d 961, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1991 WL 4332
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1991·No. No. 90-210·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because we find that the notice provided by Value Rent-A-Car, Inc., the lessor, was sufficient to shift the primary responsibility for liability and personal injury coverage from the lessor’s self-insurance to the lessee’s carrier, the Travelers Companies, we affirm.1 See Guemes v. Biscayne Auto Rentals, Inc., 414 So.2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); International Bankers Ins. Co. v. Snappy Car Rental, 553 So.2d 740 (Fla. [962]*9625th DCA 1989); § 627.7263, Fla.Stat. (1987).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Value Rent-A-Car, Inc., 573 So. 2d 961, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1991 WL 4332 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
573 So. 2d 961 (Mitchell v. Value Rent-A-Car, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Safeway Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.
592 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)