Mitchell v. United States

33 U.S. 307, 8 Pet. 307
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 1, 1834
StatusPublished

This text of 33 U.S. 307 (Mitchell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. United States, 33 U.S. 307, 8 Pet. 307 (1834).

Opinion

Mr Chief Justice Marshall

said:

A pamphlet has been sent to the judges touching the questions in controversy in this cause. The court desire it to be understood, that the practice of the court is not to receive or examine such papers, unless they have been presented in court, and shown to the opposite counsel.

It was afterwards, on the same day, stated to the court by Mr White of Florida, counsel for the appellant, that the counsel on neither side had any knowledge of the pamphlet’s having been sent to the court; nor did they in any manner countenance the same. The pamphlet was sent to the judges by an agent of the appellant, who was not in any manner aware of the irregularity of the proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 U.S. 307, 8 Pet. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-united-states-scotus-1834.