Mitchell v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys
This text of Mitchell v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys (Mitchell v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
David Mitchell,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-1980 (JDB) United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM
In this action brought pro se under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C.
§ 552, plaintiff sought records from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation pertaining to him. On March 18, 2009, defendants moved for
summary judgment. By Order of March 18, 2009, plaintiff was directed to respond by April 27,
2009 to defendants’ motion or risk entry of judgment for the movants on a conceded motion.
Plaintiff has not responded to the motion or sought additional time to do so. Hence, the Court
will grant defendants’ motion for summary judgment as conceded.1 A separate Order
accompanies this Memorandum.
s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge Dated: June 1, 2009
1 See In re Miller, 2004 WL 963819, 1 (D.C. Cir., May 4, 2004) (In managing its docket under the circumstances presented, “the court may choose to . . . resolve the motion for summary judgment on the merits without an opposition . . . or [] treat summary judgment as conceded.”)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mitchell v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-united-states-department-of-justice-exe-dcd-2009.