Mitchell v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 390 F. App'x 260
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2010·No. 10-6460·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6460

JASON MITCHELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; MONONGALIA GENERAL HOSPITAL; ROGER KING; GREENWALD; ANTENELLI; WATSON; BRIMSON; ODDO; KAMICAR; KERN; HAGGERTY,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00195-IMK-JES)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jason Mitchell appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint, which was properly construed as one

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. United

States, No. 1:08-cv-00195-IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 11, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. United States, (4th Cir. 2010).

Mitchell v. United States (Mitchell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related