Mitchell v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

318 S.W.3d 232, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 806
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 2010·No. ED 94003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Thurston Mitchell (Plaintiff) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis dismissing his suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) against the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company (Railroad), based on forum non conveniens. The trial court granted Railroad’s motion to dismiss, finding that under all the facts, it would be too burdensome to require Railroad to defend the suit in that court. Within thirty days after entering judgment, the trial court entered a supplemental order, to which the parties agreed, ruling that once Plaintiff filed suit in a forum outside Missouri, Railroad was not to include the time the lawsuit was pending in Missouri in any time-limitations defense. If Railroad violates such condition, then the trial court will accept jurisdiction upon Plaintiffs re-filing the action within sixty days of Railroad’s violation. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, 318 S.W.3d 232, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 806 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

318 S.W.3d 232 (Mitchell v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sales v. Bank
318 S.W.3d 232 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)