Mitchell v. Tucker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mitchell v. Tucker

97 So. 3d 339, 2012 WL 4208782, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15886

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 21, 2012

DocketNo. 5D12-1833

StatusPublished

This text of 97 So. 3d 339 (Mitchell v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Tucker, 97 So. 3d 339, 2012 WL 4208782, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15886 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hammond v. Howard 828 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (reiterating that where custody dispute is between parents and third person, rights of parents are paramount unless there is showing that parents are unfit or that, for some substantial reason, custody [340]*340in either or both parents would be detrimental to child’s welfare).

ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hammond v. Howard 828 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (reiterating that where custody dispute is between parents and third person, rights of parents are paramount unless there is showing that parents are unfit or that, for some substantial reason, custody [340]*340in either or both parents would be detrimental to child’s welfare).

ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 3d 339, 2012 WL 4208782, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-tucker-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack