Mitchell v. Troyanos

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2009·No. 19-4629·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6335

STEPHEN SCOTT MITCHELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SUSAN TROYANOS, Senior Probation and Parole Officer,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00049-RBS-FBS)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Scott Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stephen Scott Mitchell appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Mitchell v. Troyanos,

No. 2:09-cv-00049-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. Troyanos, (4th Cir. 2009).

Mitchell v. Troyanos (Mitchell v. Troyanos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)