Mitchell v. Troyanos
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6335
STEPHEN SCOTT MITCHELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SUSAN TROYANOS, Senior Probation and Parole Officer,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00049-RBS-FBS)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Scott Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Stephen Scott Mitchell appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Mitchell v. Troyanos,
No. 2:09-cv-00049-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Troyanos (Mitchell v. Troyanos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.