Mitchell v. Traxler

Fourth Circuit

Mitchell v. Traxler

672 F. App'x 320

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 10, 2017

DocketNo. 16-1507

StatusPublished

This text of 672 F. App'x 320 (Mitchell v. Traxler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Traxler, 672 F. App'x 320 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Trader, No. 5:15-ev-00399-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2016). We further deny Mitchell’s motion for a restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Trader, No. 5:15-ev-00399-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2016). We further deny Mitchell’s motion for a restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 F. App'x 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-traxler-ca4-2017.