Mitchell v. Traxler

Fourth Circuit

Mitchell v. Traxler

672 F. App'x 320

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2017·No. No. 16-1507·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Trader, No. 5:15-ev-00399-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2016). We further deny Mitchell’s motion for a restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Trader, No. 5:15-ev-00399-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2016). We further deny Mitchell’s motion for a restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Mitchell v. Traxler, 672 F. App'x 320 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

672 F. App'x 320 (Mitchell v. Traxler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.