Mitchell v. State
This text of 269 S.W.2d 376 (Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $350.
The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.
[377]*377The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
No motion for rehearing will be entertained and mandate will issue forthwith.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 S.W.2d 376, 1954 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-texcrimapp-1954.