Mitchell v. State

1926 OK CR 399, 250 P. 1118, 35 Okla. Crim. 358, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 398
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Okla. Crim. 167
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 30, 1926·No. No. A-6293.·Published

Opinion

BESSEY, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor, with his punishment fixed at a fine of $400. An official record has been filed, showing the death of plaintiff in error, along with a motion that the cause be abated. The motion is allowed, the cause abated, and stricken from the docket.

DOYLE and EDWARDS’, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. State, 1926 OK CR 399, 250 P. 1118, 35 Okla. Crim. 358, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 398 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

1926 OK CR 399 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.