Mitchell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Mitchell v. State

1914 OK CR 100, 140 P. 622, 10 Okla. Crim. 697, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 189

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 Okla. Crim. 563 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 2, 1914·No. No. A-1961.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Mollie Mitchell, was tried for the correlative offense just considered, in the case of Kitchens v. State, ante. She also was found guilty and her punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year. The judgment and sentence was rendered and entered on the 11th day of October, 1912. The facts in the case are substantially the same, and the questions presented are the same as those just decided in the companion case. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in the ease of Kitchens v. State, supra, the judgment of conviction herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Mollie Mitchell, was tried for the correlative offense just considered, in the case of Kitchens v. State, ante. She also was found guilty and her punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year. The judgment and sentence was rendered and entered on the 11th day of October, 1912. The facts in the case are substantially the same, and the questions presented are the same as those just decided in the companion case. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in the ease of Kitchens v. State, supra, the judgment of conviction herein is affirmed.

Mitchell v. State, 1914 OK CR 100, 140 P. 622, 10 Okla. Crim. 697, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 189 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK CR 100 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.