Mitchell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mitchell v. State

783 S.W.2d 507, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 176, 1990 WL 6716

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 74 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 1990·No. No. 56782·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Mitchell v. State, 783 S.W.2d 507, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 176, 1990 WL 6716 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

783 S.W.2d 507 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.