Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mitchell v. State

153 S.E. 535, 41 Ga. App. 504, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 960

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1930

Docket20504

StatusPublished

This text of 153 S.E. 535 (Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. State, 153 S.E. 535, 41 Ga. App. 504, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 960 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwobtii, J.

1. Special grounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the motion for a new trial are each based upon an alleged error in the charge. When these alleged errors are considered in the light of the remainder of the charge and the facts of the case, there is no merit in either of the grounds.

2. Special grounds 5, 6, and 7 are at best but amplifications of the general grounds. Moreover, neither of them is complete and understandable within itself and they present nothing for the consideration of this court.

3. The evidence supports the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the ease, and no error was committed when a new trial was refused. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., wnd Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodwobtii, J.

1. Special grounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the motion for a new trial are each based upon an alleged error in the charge. When these alleged errors are considered in the light of the remainder of the charge and the facts of the case, there is no merit in either of the grounds.

2. Special grounds 5, 6, and 7 are at best but amplifications of the general grounds. Moreover, neither of them is complete and understandable within itself and they present nothing for the consideration of this court.

3. The evidence supports the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the ease, and no error was committed when a new trial was refused. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., wnd Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 S.E. 535, 41 Ga. App. 504, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-gactapp-1930.