Mitchell v. State
93 S.E. 1022, 21 Ga. App. 77, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 431
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Ga. App. 778 →
Opinion
1. Where one with intent to steal takes actual possession of the property of another, and removes it to any distance whatever, he is guilty of larceny. Smith v. State, 15 Ga. App. 400, (83 S. E. 437).
2. The circumstantial evidence was sufficient to establish the guilt of the. defendant to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.
3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 93 S.E. 1022, 21 Ga. App. 77, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 431 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
93 S.E. 1022 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
83 S.E. 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)