Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mitchell v. State

Mitchell v. State

140 So. 3d 1140, 2014 WL 2781828, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9345
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16702 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2014·No. No. 5D13-4297·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the rule 3.801 motion filed by appellant, Willie Mitchell, based on the facial insufficiency of the motion. Such affirmance is without prejudice to Mitchell amending his motion to state a facially sufficient claim. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(e).

PALMER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. State, 140 So. 3d 1140, 2014 WL 2781828, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9345 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

140 So. 3d 1140 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.