Mitchell v. State
776 So. 2d 1114, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1212, 2001 WL 108749
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2001·No. No. 5D00-1509·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Michael Darnell Mitchell appeals his sentence for violation of probation. He contends on appeal that section 893.13(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1997) is unconstitutionally vague, and violates the due process and equal protection provisions of the federal and state constitutions. We affirm based upon the authority of Rice v. State, 754 So.2d 881 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, No. SC00-1070, — So.2d - (Fla. Dec.19, 2000). In Rice, we held that section 893.13(1)(e) does not violate the state or federal constitution.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1114, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1212, 2001 WL 108749 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
776 So. 2d 1114 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prevatt v. State
776 So. 2d 1114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)