Mitchell v. State
This text of 34 Fla. Supp. 2d 65 (Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The Petitioner, a defendant charged with driving under the influence, alleges that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by ordering the suspension of his driver’s license for refusing to take a breath test. The Court has reviewed the video tape and finds that, under the facts of this case, the Petitioner did refuse to take the test and thus is subject to the penalty for such refusal. In so holding the Court finds that there was no violation of the guidelines set in [66]*66Larmer v Department of Highway Safety, 522 So.2d 941 (4th DCA 1988), which we specifically adopt.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Fla. Supp. 2d 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-flacirct-1989.