Mitchell v. State
This text of 911 So. 2d 93 (Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Demetrius MITCHELL, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, FL, for Petitioner.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Consistent with our decision in Woodson v. State, 889 So.2d 823 (Fla.2004), we conclude that review herein was improvidently granted, and we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
911 So. 2d 93, 2005 WL 2095720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-fla-2005.