Mitchell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

D. Arizona

Mitchell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

DecidedApril 1, 2024

Docket4:22-cv-00477

StatusUnknown

This text of Mitchell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (Mitchell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, (D. Ariz. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Patrick J Mitchell, et al., No. CV-22-00477-TUC-JAS (MAA)

10 Plaintiffs, ORDER

11 v.

12 State Farm Fire and Casualty Company,

13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 16 Magistrate Judge Ambri that recommends denying Defendant’s motion to partially vacate 17 appraisal award (Doc. 31). A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 18 any timely objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections 19 has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 20 The Court has reviewed the record, including Defendant’s motion (Doc. 31), 21 exhibits thereto (Doc. 32), Plaintiff’s response (Doc. 37), and Defendant’s reply (Doc. 41). 22 The Court reviewed Judge Ambri’s R&R (Doc. 42). The Court did not review Defendant’s 23 objection (Doc. 44) to Judge Ambri’s R&R because it was not filed within the 14-day 24 deadline. Defendant also withdrew that objection shortly after filing it. See Doc. 45. 25 The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Ambri’s recommendations are not 26 clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems 27 Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 28 (D. Or. 1998). 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Ambri’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42) is accepted and adopted. (2) Defendant’s motion to partially vacate appraisal award (Doc. 31) is denied without 5|| prejudice. 6 Dated this 29th day of March, 2024. 7 8 A ashe. Honorable James A. Soto 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Patrick J Mitchell, et al., No. CV-22-00477-TUC-JAS (MAA)

10 Plaintiffs, ORDER

11 v.

12 State Farm Fire and Casualty Company,

13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 16 Magistrate Judge Ambri that recommends denying Defendant’s motion to partially vacate 17 appraisal award (Doc. 31). A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 18 any timely objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections 19 has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 20 The Court has reviewed the record, including Defendant’s motion (Doc. 31), 21 exhibits thereto (Doc. 32), Plaintiff’s response (Doc. 37), and Defendant’s reply (Doc. 41). 22 The Court reviewed Judge Ambri’s R&R (Doc. 42). The Court did not review Defendant’s 23 objection (Doc. 44) to Judge Ambri’s R&R because it was not filed within the 14-day 24 deadline. Defendant also withdrew that objection shortly after filing it. See Doc. 45. 25 The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Ambri’s recommendations are not 26 clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems 27 Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 28 (D. Or. 1998). 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Ambri’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42) is accepted and adopted. (2) Defendant’s motion to partially vacate appraisal award (Doc. 31) is denied without 5|| prejudice. 6 Dated this 29th day of March, 2024. 7 8 A ashe. Honorable James A. Soto 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mitchell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-farm-fire-and-casualty-company-azd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack