Mitchell v. State
205 A.3d 567, 331 Conn. 920
Opinion
The petitioner James A. Mitchell's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
''Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner's late petition for certification to appeal?'' Dante R. Gallucci, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 205 A.3d 567, 331 Conn. 920 (Colo. 2019).
205 A.3d 567 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. State
338 Conn. 66 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2021)