Mitchell v. State
This text of 205 A.3d 567 (Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner James A. Mitchell's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
''Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner's late petition for certification to appeal?'' Dante R. Gallucci, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 A.3d 567, 331 Conn. 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-conn-2019.