Mitchell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Mitchell v. State

107 So. 734, 21 Ala. App. 312, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 91

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 23, 1926

Docket8 Div. 331.

StatusPublished

This text of 107 So. 734 (Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. State, 107 So. 734, 21 Ala. App. 312, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 91 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Appellant’s counsel argues very ably and convincingly in brief that the evidence is not sufficient to justify a conviction under the indictment, but nowhere in the record is the question raised in 'such manner as calls fer a review of the court’s action in the matter.

The affirmative charge is not requested, nor is there an application for a new trial. The rulings of the court, as they appear in the record, are free from error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Appellant’s counsel argues very ably and convincingly in brief that the evidence is not sufficient to justify a conviction under the indictment, but nowhere in the record is the question raised in 'such manner as calls fer a review of the court’s action in the matter.

The affirmative charge is not requested, nor is there an application for a new trial. The rulings of the court, as they appear in the record, are free from error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 So. 734, 21 Ala. App. 312, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-alactapp-1926.