Mitchell v. State
107 So. 734, 21 Ala. App. 312, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 91
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ala. App. 300 →
Opinion
Appellant’s counsel argues very ably and convincingly in brief that the evidence is not sufficient to justify a conviction under the indictment, but nowhere in the record is the question raised in 'such manner as calls fer a review of the court’s action in the matter.
The affirmative charge is not requested, nor is there an application for a new trial. The rulings of the court, as they appear in the record, are free from error, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 107 So. 734, 21 Ala. App. 312, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 91 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
107 So. 734 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.