Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Mitchell v. Salant

Mitchell v. Salant

173 A.D. 949
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Judg[950]*950ment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the sole ground of the erroneous proceeding by plaintiff’s trial counsel in asking a prospective juror a question based upon the stated contingency “if it should transpire that an insurance company was interested in the case.” Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Mills, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. Salant, 173 A.D. 949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

173 A.D. 949 (Mitchell v. Salant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.