Mitchell v. Russell

3 Stew. 53
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 15, 1830·Published

Opinion

By JUDGE COLLIER

The defendant has prevented; the writ of error from being regularly prosecuted, and cannot now be permitted to profit by his own wrong. The judgment of affirmance is therefore denied, and the plaintiff has leave to discontinue his writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. Russell, 3 Stew. 53 (Ala. 1830).

3 Stew. 53 (Mitchell v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.