Mitchell v. Robbins
This text of 447 So. 2d 1034 (Mitchell v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Summary judgment was entered against appellants’ suit for damages which stemmed from injuries suffered in an automobile accident. We reverse and hold the foreseeability of theft and any subsequent accident, following a delivery truck operator’s failure to remove keys from the ignition, presents a jury question, notwithstanding section 316.1975, Florida Statutes (1981). See Vining v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 354 So.2d 54 (Fla.1977).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a trial on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 So. 2d 1034, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-robbins-fladistctapp-1984.