Mitchell v. Robbins
447 So. 2d 1034, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12509
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1984·No. No. 83-1551·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Summary judgment was entered against appellants’ suit for damages which stemmed from injuries suffered in an automobile accident. We reverse and hold the foreseeability of theft and any subsequent accident, following a delivery truck operator’s failure to remove keys from the ignition, presents a jury question, notwithstanding section 316.1975, Florida Statutes (1981). See Vining v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 354 So.2d 54 (Fla.1977).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a trial on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Robbins, 447 So. 2d 1034, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12509 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
447 So. 2d 1034 (Mitchell v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rubin v. Brutus Corp.
487 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
O'Connor v. O'Connor
447 So. 2d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)