Mitchell v. Richmond

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Mitchell v. Richmond

30 A. 486, 164 Pa. 566, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1121

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 5, 1894

DocketAppeal, No. 43

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 30 A. 486 (Mitchell v. Richmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Richmond, 30 A. 486, 164 Pa. 566, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1121 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in the third and fourth specifications of error that would justify a reversal of the judgment. The first and second specifications relate to the question of law reserved. That question has been so fully considered and satisfactorily disposed of by the learned president of the court below, in his opinion sent up with the record, that little, if anything, can be added thereto; and we- therefore affirm the judgment on Iris opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in the third and fourth specifications of error that would justify a reversal of the judgment. The first and second specifications relate to the question of law reserved. That question has been so fully considered and satisfactorily disposed of by the learned president of the court below, in his opinion sent up with the record, that little, if anything, can be added thereto; and we- therefore affirm the judgment on Iris opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A. 486, 164 Pa. 566, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-richmond-pa-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack