Mitchell v. Read
61 Barb. 310, 1872 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 38
Opinion
I think this case was properly disposed of at the special term.
It is unnecessary to add any suggestions to the opinion rendered at the trial, by the justice trying the cause.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Ingraham, P, J., and Geo, G. Barnard and Cardozo, Justices.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Read, 61 Barb. 310, 1872 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 38 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1872).
61 Barb. 310 (Mitchell v. Read) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crook v. Crook
20 Abb. N. Cas. 249 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1887)
Standard Oil Co. v. Scofield
16 Abb. N. Cas. 372 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Weston v. Ketcham
7 Jones & S. 54 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1875)