Mitchell v. Read
61 Barb. 310, 1872 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 38
This text of 61 Barb. 310 (Mitchell v. Read) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mitchell v. Read, 61 Barb. 310, 1872 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 38 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1872).
Opinion
I think this case was properly disposed of at the special term.
It is unnecessary to add any suggestions to the opinion rendered at the trial, by the justice trying the cause.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Ingraham, P, J., and Geo, G. Barnard and Cardozo, Justices.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crook v. Crook
20 Abb. N. Cas. 249 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1887)
Standard Oil Co. v. Scofield
16 Abb. N. Cas. 372 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Weston v. Ketcham
7 Jones & S. 54 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1875)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 Barb. 310, 1872 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-read-nysupct-1872.