Mitchell v. Purser
This text of 342 S.E.2d 753 (Mitchell v. Purser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From a judgment granting appellees visitation rights to their grandchild, appellants filed a direct appeal to the Supreme Court. *268 The Supreme Court transferred the case to this court. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), “[ajppeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, child custody, and other domestic relations cases . . .” must be sought by application. (Emphasis supplied.) “ ‘ “Visitation privileges are, of course, part of custody. [Cits.]’”” Tuttle v. Stauffer, 177 Ga. App. 112 (338 SE2d 544) (1985). Therefore, “the instant appeal is subject to OCGA § 5-6-35 and must be dismissed for failure to comply with the procedure established by that statute.” Dudai v. Spisak, 170 Ga. App. 744 (318 SE2d 501) (1984).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
342 S.E.2d 753, 178 Ga. App. 267, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-purser-gactapp-1986.