Mitchell v. Principi
This text of Mitchell v. Principi (Mitchell v. Principi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1025
EDWARD BERNARD MITCHELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:04-cv-02237-PMD)
Submitted: February 13, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chalmers C. Johnson, CHALMERS JOHNSON LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellant. Reginald I. Lloyd, United States Attorney, Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edward Bernard Mitchell appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Mitchell’s
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Principi, 467 F. Supp.
2d 544 (D.S.C. 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mitchell v. Principi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-principi-ca4-2008.