Mitchell v. Pool Supply Marketing, Figa
This text of 527 So. 2d 935 (Mitchell v. Pool Supply Marketing, Figa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals that portion of the deputy commissioner’s order making findings in regard to apportionment and permanent impairment. We agree with appellant that since those findings went beyond the issues framed by the order or stipulated to by the parties, the deputy commissioner erred in making those findings. See Trujillo v. Southern Wine and Spirits, Etc., 525 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Regal Marine Industries v. Cappucci, 523 So.2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); and Sewell Plastics, Inc. v. Jackson, 418 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Therefore, that portion of the order making findings as to permanent impairment and apportionment is hereby stricken. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
527 So. 2d 935, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1532, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 1988 WL 67269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-pool-supply-marketing-figa-fladistctapp-1988.