Mitchell v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
This text of 85 Pa. Super. 434 (Mitchell v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals from a verdict recovered against it for $600, asserting that the verdict was against the evidence and against the law. Its motion for a new trial was dismissed, and judgment was entered on the verdict.
We are not favored with an opinion by the trial judge, but after a careful examination of all the evidence and the charge to the jury, we are satisfied that the court rightly refused the defendant’s point for binding instructions, and that the disputed facts were fairly submitted to the only tribunal provided by law to dispose of them.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 Pa. Super. 434, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-philadelphia-rapid-transit-co-pasuperct-1924.