Mitchell v. Parks
This text of 54 A.D.2d 895 (Mitchell v. Parks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., which action arises out of an automobile collision, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 9, 1976, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment. Order afiirmed, without costs or disbursements. While plaintiffs made out a persuasive case of negligence on the part of defendant, there still remains a question of fact as to whether defendant’s conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care (see Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 A.D.2d 895, 388 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-parks-nyappdiv-1976.