Mitchell v. O'Connell
This text of 279 A.D. 1137 (Mitchell v. O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: The respondent was not a poHce official within the prohibition of section 128 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. AE concur. (Appeal from an order annulling the determination of the State Liquor Authority which refused to issue a-solicitor’s permit to petitioner, and directing the issuance of such permit.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, KimbaE and Piper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 1137, 112 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-oconnell-nyappdiv-1952.