Mitchell v. O'Connell
279 A.D. 1137, 112 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6083
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 14, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Memorandum: The respondent was not a poHce official within the prohibition of section 128 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. AE concur. (Appeal from an order annulling the determination of the State Liquor Authority which refused to issue a-solicitor’s permit to petitioner, and directing the issuance of such permit.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, KimbaE and Piper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. O'Connell, 279 A.D. 1137, 112 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1137 (Mitchell v. O'Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jowdy v. State Liquor Authority
49 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)