Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman
This text of 471 F. App'x 212 (Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Darius Mitchell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman, No. 4:11-cv-00118-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 F. App'x 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-northrop-grumman-ca4-2012.