Mitchell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

Ninth Circuit

Mitchell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

213 F. 1022, 129 C.C.A. 665, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1979

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 11, 1914·No. No. 2330·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case having been reached in the regular call of the docket, and there being no appearance in open court of counsel for either party, and it appearing .that the record has not been printed, as required by rule 23, and that no brief has been filed by or on behalf of either party thereto, as required by rule 24, thereupon, upon consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged that writ of error be and hereby is dismissed, under section 3 of rule 22, and for failure of plaintiff in error to print record, as required by rule 23, and for failure of plaintiff in error to file a brief, as required by rule 24.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case having been reached in the regular call of the docket, and there being no appearance in open court of counsel for either party, and it appearing .that the record has not been printed, as required by rule 23, and that no brief has been filed by or on behalf of either party thereto, as required by rule 24, thereupon, upon consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged that writ of error be and hereby is dismissed, under section 3 of rule 22, and for failure of plaintiff in error to print record, as required by rule 23, and for failure of plaintiff in error to file a brief, as required by rule 24.

Mitchell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 213 F. 1022, 129 C.C.A. 665, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1979 (9th Cir. 1914).

Pincite

213 F. 1022 (Mitchell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.