Mitchell v. Newman

4 Pennyp. 443
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 25, 1884·No. No. 58·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This agreement of submission contains something more than a mere submission. It further stipulates that the defendant in error should give to the plaintiff in error possession of the books and papers of the firm, and that the latter should become the liquidating partner, with full power to dispose of its assets and pay its indebtedness therewith. This was a sufficient consideration to make the submission irrevocable -when made. An attempted revocation just as the award is about to be announced, and when there is persuasive evidence that the party had substantial knowledge of the conclusion at which the referees had arrived, is not entitled to much favor. It cannot be asserted except under a clear claim of right. Such right did not exist in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. Newman, 4 Pennyp. 443 (Pa. 1884).

4 Pennyp. 443 (Mitchell v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ernst v. McDowell
11 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 145 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1911)
Buckwalter v. Russell
13 A. 310 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)