Mitchell v. Mitchell

Opinion

5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM 6

7 KENNETH LAMAR MITCHELL, 8 DOMESTIC CASE NO. DM 0381-12 Plaintiff, 9 v. lO DECISION AND ORDER CORINIA MARIE DELA FUENTES II MITCHELL, 12 Defendant. l3

15 This matter came before the Honorable Arthur R. Barcinas on the Plaintiffs Motion for

16 Service by Publication. Attorney John Terlaje represented the Plaintiff. The Defendant has not 17 been served and has not appeared. It appears to the Court that no memorandum of points and 18 authorities was filed with the Plaintiffs motion. On review of the materials on file, the Court 19

20 finds no grounds on which the motion could be granted. The Plaintiffs motion is therefore

21 DENIED without prejudice and with leave to refile. The Plaintiff is reminded of the Court's 22 guidance on service by publication in its Decision and Order of August 23, 2012. 23

24 IT IS SO ORDERED: _ _ 0__1_3_2_0_13__ 25

27 HONORABLE ARTHUR R. 28 Judge, Superior Court of Guam