Mitchell v. Mitchell

61 A. 570, 212 Pa. 62, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 550
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 8, 1905
DocketAppeal, No. 32
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 A. 570 (Mitchell v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 61 A. 570, 212 Pa. 62, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 550 (Pa. 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The principle volenti non fit injuria is a good defense to what would otherwise be actual fraud: Zuver v. Clark, 104 Pa. 222, and a fortiori it is good against merely constructive fraud. The jury have found that plaintiff knew and assented to the conveyance by defendant to the latter’s wife. That ended the plaintiff’s case.

An attorney at law who acts for both parties in negotiations or communications in presence of both is a competent witness for either as to such matters: Goodwin Gas Stove & Meter Co.’s Appeal, 117 Pa. 514.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tracy v. Tracy
105 A.2d 122 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
Doll v. Loesel
136 A. 796 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Ritter v. Wray
45 Pa. Super. 440 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A. 570, 212 Pa. 62, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-mitchell-pa-1905.