Mitchell v. Mitchell

61 A. 570, 212 Pa. 62, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 550
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 8, 1905·No. Appeal, No. 32·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The principle volenti non fit injuria is a good defense to what would otherwise be actual fraud: Zuver v. Clark, 104 Pa. 222, and a fortiori it is good against merely constructive fraud. The jury have found that plaintiff knew and assented to the conveyance by defendant to the latter’s wife. That ended the plaintiff’s case.

An attorney at law who acts for both parties in negotiations or communications in presence of both is a competent witness for either as to such matters: Goodwin Gas Stove & Meter Co.’s Appeal, 117 Pa. 514.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. Mitchell, 61 A. 570, 212 Pa. 62, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 550 (Pa. 1905).

61 A. 570 (Mitchell v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tracy v. Tracy
105 A.2d 122 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
Doll v. Loesel
136 A. 796 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Ritter v. Wray
45 Pa. Super. 440 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)