Mitchell v. Mitchell

128 S.E. 436, 160 Ga. 466, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 185
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 10, 1925
DocketNo. 4725
StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 436 (Mitchell v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 128 S.E. 436, 160 Ga. 466, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 185 (Ga. 1925).

Opinion

Hines, J.

On the trial of an application for permanent alimony the jury returned a verdict in favor of the husband. The wife moved for a new trial on the formal grounds. The trial judge overruled her motion, and to this judgment she excepted. Held: There being some evidence to support the verdict, and the same having received the approval of the trial judge, we can not say that he abused his discretion in denying a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., absent for providential cause. LeSueur & LeSueur, for plaintiff. C. L. Shepard, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 436, 160 Ga. 466, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-mitchell-ga-1925.