Mitchell v. Mitchell

509 So. 2d 967, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1609, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9055
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-1737
StatusPublished

This text of 509 So. 2d 967 (Mitchell v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. Mitchell, 509 So. 2d 967, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1609, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9055 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

It has been brought to the attention of the court by counsel that this is an appeal from a non-final order granting a motion to dismiss. In Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), this court, en banc, determined that an attempted appeal from such an order does not vest jurisdiction in this court. We therefore sua sponte dismiss this appeal.

WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell v. Russell
507 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
509 So. 2d 967, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1609, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-mitchell-fladistctapp-1987.